Renewal secures Investigative Case Management (ICM) platform four more years, raising Fourth Amendment concerns over mass data aggregation and digital privacy.
Trump, as always, he is following in other fascists footsteps, and the whole ICE brown shirts, Gestapo tactics with using billionaire Peter Theil's Palantir surveillance network, is par for the course and Theil, he is another fascist like Trump, who wants American democracy to be gone! where only the rich survive with dignity and freedom and everyone else as serfs and it is Thiel, who among the many awful things, has said, the democracy is not compatible with capitalism and should end. The word, capitalism, in his context, is make money at the expense of everything and everyone else, so in that context of incompatibility, he is right.
You are 100% correct. You and I touched on Carpenter but precedent goes deeper — Three key cases for Third-party Doctrine. I expect this will come before SCOTUS in 2026, that is if Americans wake up to this attempt relitigate Fourth Amendment.
United States v. Miller (1976): The Supreme Court ruled that individuals have no privacy interest in bank records held by the bank, setting the foundation for the doctrine.
Smith v. Maryland (1979): The Court extended the doctrine to telephone metadata, holding that there is no expectation of privacy in the numbers dialed because that information is voluntarily given to the phone company.
Carpenter v. United States (2018): A significant shift, the Court ruled that the government generally needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information, as this data provides a detailed, intimate picture of a person's life and is collected without an affirmative act by the user.
Trump, as always, he is following in other fascists footsteps, and the whole ICE brown shirts, Gestapo tactics with using billionaire Peter Theil's Palantir surveillance network, is par for the course and Theil, he is another fascist like Trump, who wants American democracy to be gone! where only the rich survive with dignity and freedom and everyone else as serfs and it is Thiel, who among the many awful things, has said, the democracy is not compatible with capitalism and should end. The word, capitalism, in his context, is make money at the expense of everything and everyone else, so in that context of incompatibility, he is right.
You are 100% correct. You and I touched on Carpenter but precedent goes deeper — Three key cases for Third-party Doctrine. I expect this will come before SCOTUS in 2026, that is if Americans wake up to this attempt relitigate Fourth Amendment.
United States v. Miller (1976): The Supreme Court ruled that individuals have no privacy interest in bank records held by the bank, setting the foundation for the doctrine.
Smith v. Maryland (1979): The Court extended the doctrine to telephone metadata, holding that there is no expectation of privacy in the numbers dialed because that information is voluntarily given to the phone company.
Carpenter v. United States (2018): A significant shift, the Court ruled that the government generally needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information, as this data provides a detailed, intimate picture of a person's life and is collected without an affirmative act by the user.